| Essay
5
“WHAT I TELL YOU THREE TIMES IS TRUE”
Lewis Carroll
The
Baron rode along on his favourite horse and finally came to the gates
of the city that was his destination. The entrance was well fortified,
complete with towers and a portcullis. Just as the Baron was passing through
the arch, the rope holding the portcullis snapped, and the spiked barrier
dropped onto the horse immediately behind the saddle, severing the creature
in two. Recovering quickly from his shock, the Baron cut some thin and
flexible twigs from a nearby bush, and sewed the horse together again.
Not only did the horse survive, but the twigs took root, and grew into
a canopy that protected the Baron from sun and rain as he rode along.
The Baron in question was the famous Munchausen who has since become notorious
by virtue of his name having been expropriated to describe a peculiar
psychological condition – a ‘syndrome’, no less. This
condition has since become more commonly known about than the original
Baron – who in fact was a rumbustious teller of tall tales and vastly
removed from the concept of a ‘peculiar psychological condition’
(though he might have been flattered by the notion of having become a
‘syndrome’!). The truth of his reputation has been degraded
even more severely by having his name attached to the extended label ‘Munchausen
syndrome by proxy’.
This latter label has been degraded itself as the result of certain recent
and high profile legal cases, and yet it is not so long ago that the ‘diagnosis’
was being ‘knowledgeably’ bandied about by individuals working
in psychiatry as if they were fully acquainted with the condition and
its correct interpretation. Each time that I heard these and other similar
comments, I was reminded of the results of a survey that I had read, which
had been carried out amongst people who worked in areas of high finance.
It was found that a significant number used the esoteric jargon of the
financial world even though they did not understand it, simply to appear
to be ‘in the know’.
Which makes me speculate that in other areas of human activity the same
compulsions to appear knowledgeable exist, and in the world of the human
mind and its malfunctions, the scope for professional obfuscation and
self-delusion is wide, wide, wide. Within the world of the voice hearer,
the alleged ‘schizophrenic’, the world that primarily concerns
me, I must confess to being disturbed by such comments as:
“Let me specify at the outset which condition I am speaking of here:
this is only one of the many syndromes that pass under the name ‘schizophrenia’...”
Dr. John Perry, Professor of Psychiatry, University of California.
“A heritage of distortions, stagnant certainty, and self-serving
territoriality characterises the fields of knowledge about this dreaded
disorder [schizophrenia] – aptly called the cancer of the mind”
– Schizophrenias Genesis by Dr. Irving J Gottesman, who offers his
book “...to help fill the information gap between the ‘ivory
towers of academia’, with its research ‘factories’ and
private language, and the idiosyncratic narratives glorifying or obfuscating
disorders of the mind”. He further wrote: “The absence so
far of a solution compels me to be skeptical about received wisdom from
all participants, however noble and well-intended.”
In his book, Dr. Gottesman refers to more than four hundred books and
other publications, all aimed at exploring and defining the human condition
and studying the aberrant mind. You can search, as I have done, for anything,
anything at all, that was written by anyone at all who had first hand
experience of the conditions being studied and reviewed. Your search will
be in vain; pointless. When you see the sub-title of the book, you may
realise where the author was coming from and what his original mind-set
was. He chose The Origins of Madness to give a wider understanding of
the scope of his book. Other recent authors seem to work from a similar
presupposition when they entitle their book Voices of Reason, Voices of
Madness.
Coming closer to acceptability in terms of content, and my own determination,
is the often-quoted chapter derived from a book by a Clinical Psychologist,
Wilson Van Dusen. He writes in this chapter of The Presence of Spirits
in Madness, and even though he uses the detestable terminology of his
profession, namely ‘madness’, ‘hallucinations’
and ‘delusions’, he nevertheless arrives at conclusions that
agree fundamentally with my own personal experience. Van Dusen’s
writings are based upon the study of ‘thousands of mentally ill
persons’: my experiences distilled into my book* derive from almost
twenty-five years individual and daily interaction with what I profoundly
know are spiritual intrusions.
Brian Inglis in his book The Unknown Guest provides many instances of
well-known artists, musicians, composers, writers and poets who in their
lifetimes had frankly admitted that without the presence of their ‘muse’
– this spiritual ‘other’ - in their art, they could
only produce work that was mundane and ‘soulless’. Renowned
concert pianist, John Lill, OBE, has described many times how he has received
spiritual voices and visions during his long and highly successful performing
career. To the best of my knowledge, no one has suggested that any of
the people cited by Brian Inglis were mad. Foolhardy would be the ones
who had the temerity to suggest that John Lill is. (I have a recording
that I made of Mr. Lill talking to Sue Lawley on ‘Desert Island
Discs’ in which he described graphically various events, but acknowledged
how easy it is to be misunderstood).
I have often spoken or written about a former parish priest at my church
who would wax lyrical about the marvellous achievements of those who had
responded to inner voices, voices that he himself had no doubt were of
spiritual origin. Invariably, however, he would end with the admonishment
that if any of us heard voices, we should seek psychiatric help.
No matter what I start to write about, invariably and unerringly I am
drawn to this same point and the resulting conclusions, conclusions that
may be said to be reinforced by the overturning of yet another verdict
laid at the door of the now infamous Baron Munchausen and his ‘syndrome
by proxy’. A retrial has been ordered in the case of a woman jailed
for life for murdering her infant son, jailed by the label given her by
the now discredited paediatrician whose diagnosis was invariably accepted
because who was there to question it? This very morning I heard on the
radio the distressed voices of mothers whose children had been taken into
care because of a diagnosis of M.S.B.P. (Munchausen’s Syndrome By
Proxy has become just another set of initials to be bandied about in a
‘knowledgeable’ fashion!). These mothers had been trying via
the General Medical Council to have their complaints of misdiagnosis heard
and their children restored – one woman has waited seven years and
her case has not yet been dealt with fully. The mothers have found that
the very act of trying to get redress has been treated as yet another
bit of evidence that they exhibit M.S.B.P., and that their appeal to the
G.M.C. is ‘just another bit of attention seeking’! It makes
me think of the times when women were accused of witchcraft: once the
‘diagnosis’ had been made, a form of collective hysteria seemingly
took over, and the outcome for the woman was inevitable.
In the world of mental health and psychiatry, labels abound and are fastened
on individuals often on the flimsiest of evidence and never subsequently
questioned – only added to. Thus the ‘voice hearer’
suddenly becomes ‘the schizoid’; ‘the psychotic’;
‘the schizophrenic’; ‘the paranoid schizophrenic’;
finally (beloved of the tabloid media) ‘the violent paranoid schizophrenic’.
But who is there to order a ‘retrial’ for the person labelled,
found guilty and ‘sentenced’?
How many people in the past have been incarcerated for long periods, possibly
for life, in mental institutions because of a label stuck on them early
in life? How many even now are ‘imprisoned’ and held in the
shackles and chains of some mind bending drug or drugs – held without
remission in some cases, for often a point is reached where life without
the drugs has become impossible? I am acquainted with one man who had
an alleged psychotic episode when he was seventeen. He is now forty-seven,
and for thirty years he has never known life without serious ‘anti-psychotic’
drugs. Yet he knows, and knows with absolute certainty, that his ‘voices’
derive from spiritual sources, but he now has lost all confidence in himself
and his ability to cope with real life and dare not give up the drugs.
Where are the advocates, the ‘protectors’ of the defenceless?
Who is there to ensure that ‘psychiatry’ doesn’t hold
sway over the lives and futures of the vulnerable? Who is there to blow
the whistle on the pharmaceuticals for whom a successful outcome of their
trials is far more important than restoring the lives of individuals whose
‘illness’ is often the result of an intake of prescribed drugs?
Recently I read of a report in which responsible authorities drew attention
to the fact that tests that had recommended levels of prescription to
juveniles allegedly suffering from depression, had been conducted by groups
or individuals who are sustained financially by these same drug companies,
and the levels were far too high. (I have since heard that results that
did not support the desired outcome were actually suppressed). I know,
it happens all the time and profits are far more important than individuals.
But my rage is intense when I hear of young people being dragged into
the psychiatric net, and given mind-altering drugs, when often all that
they need are properly balanced diets, and the avoidance of poisons that
are pumped into convenience foods and drinks under the guise of additives
and sugar substitutes: substances that add nothing to the nutrition of
the product but make it more attractive, saleable, profitable: substances
that can and do cause asthma, hyperactivity, obesity and depression, and
much, much more. And of course, the kids get a label.
Where are the real and genuine advocates? Where are the organisations
to which people can turn before they get sucked into the great maw of
the ‘mental machine’? Cancer has its ‘Gentle Approach’
organisations. The cancers of the mind need the gentle approach as well,
but apart from such groups as the Hearing Voices Network and centres such
as The Retreat Hospital in York, where are organisations that are not
tainted by the money and support of commercial organisations? I’m
sorry, but I could go on and on as I dwell on lives and minds that have
been altered drastically and for the worse by the very institutions and
research bodies that purport to protect them. Before I carry on getting
carried away, let us return to Baron Munchausen for some moments of sanity,
and before he became a syndrome:
The Baron was travelling on his own through a tropical jungle, when his
way was barred by a large river. He stopped to decide what to do, for
he was prevented by forest from going to the right or left, but suddenly
realised that a huge crocodile that had been basking was making a rush
at him with its mouth wide open and ready to snatch him. He turned to
run only to realise that a mighty lion that had been stalking him was
about to spring. Instinctively he dropped to the ground, and his terror
was immense as he expected to be torn by claws and teeth. When some time
had passed and this had not happened, he took courage and opened his eyes
to the amazing sight that was revealed. The lion had sprung right over
him and had gone head first into the open jaws of the crocodile, which
hung on with all its might. Seizing the moment, the Baron cut off the
lion’s head and pushed it further down the crocodile’s throat,
thereby suffocating it. His triumph was complete when he took the stuffed
crocodile, forty feet long, back to his native Amsterdam, where it can
be seen even to this day in one of the museums, along with some tobacco
pouches that he had had made from the skin of the lion and then given
to the Aldermen of that city.
Essay 6.
“Away
with the Fairies”
“Anno 1670 – not far from Cirencester, was an apparition.
Being demanded whether a good spirit or a bad? returned no answer, but
disappeared with a curious perfume and most melodious twang. Mr. W. Lilly
believes it was a fairy.”
John Aubrey 1696
Following graduation as an electrical engineer in 1950, I came north from
my native Wales, to the Lake District to work at the Sellafield nuclear
plant. I spent all of my working life there, and continue to live in and
enjoy this spectacular part of the country. My chief role was as an Instrumentation
Engineer in the chemical plants, and, principally, within the Calder Hall
power station. Many and varied were the types of measurement made, and
many and varied were the devices and techniques that were used. But of
all this variety, by far the most important, and sometimes most difficult,
was the measurement of radioactivity in its diverse forms. The measurements
were necessary for the safe and efficient operation of the various processes,
and - and of prime importance - for the safety of the operatives and the
public at large.
Alpha and beta particles, neutrons and gamma rays – all were there
- all potentially dangerous and harmful – and all were invisible.
But more than that, they could only be detected by their effect upon something
else – a device that produced little flashes of light with each
particle; the change in voltage in some other contrivance – and
so on. Properly harnessed and controlled as in a reactor, these dangers
became converted into a benevolent source of electrical power
In 1979, and several years after my early retirement, I began to experience
another phenomenon – one that is entirely invisible, potentially
uncontrollable, dangerous and even ‘life-threatening’ to the
life of the mind and spirit, and yet of immense power in its benevolent
form – but only discernible through its effect upon the human person
through the mind and senses. In that year I began to hear voices and experience
the full gamut of spiritual intrusion and interaction. In that year, “a
‘presence’ that I couldn’t see, moved from the space
in front of me, into me, and immediately my mind was charged with another
‘voice’ or provoker of thoughts, thoughts over which then
I had no control, and which were not initiated by me. In my head began
conversation as between two separate people, one of whom was me. I began
to ‘hear voices’.” And - “Thus in almost 25 years
I have never been free from intrusions that enter blatantly or subliminally
into my mind and mental faculties, and forcefully or subtly into my body
and senses.” (Extracts from my book. *)
My older brother is an Anglican clergyman, and from his late teens he
has had a profound prayer life. From that time, and subsequently since
ordination, he has been aware of spiritual presence, and the movement
within himself as either he settles to prayer, or he consecrates the Eucharist.
His mental response has always been – “If you are from God
you are welcome: if not, please go.”
What each of us in his own way is really acknowledging is that there are
intelligent, freely acting ‘entities’, ‘beings’,
‘spirits’ – call them what one will – and that
they are able to move without restraint into the human person, both physically
and mentally. In detail I can only write of my own experiences –
experiences that have involved the intensely benevolent, the consummately
malevolent and others of indeterminate behaviour. I am aware of the concepts
of ‘earthbound spirits’ and of ‘lost souls’ attached
to individuals or places, although I have never been able to reconcile
myself with, or understand the proposition of ‘soul fragments’:
however, none of these are within my experience. What I do know with certainty
is that in every culture that has ever left a record anywhere on the Earth,
this truth has been acknowledged, and a religion or philosophy has emerged
that prescribes ways of living in concert with ‘spiritual good’
and avoiding contact with, or the damaging effects of ‘spiritual
evil’.
In everything that I have written or spoken about these matters since
I first became aware, I have had one purpose, and one only. My purpose
has been this: namely to try to convince anyone who would listen or read
that the presence of intrusive malevolent ‘spirits’ is the
cause of much mental disturbance. Undoubtedly it is the prime cause of
schizophrenia, and may be a major component of manic depression, multiple
personality, obsessions, compulsions and behavioural problems. My experiences
and resultant arguments are described fully in my book, and I can do no
more than indicate a few conclusions. I do not write of anything that
could be described as ‘spirit release’, because the unwanted
spirits with which one is dealing are intelligent, cunning and have free
will. Instead I have written to inform and encourage and to suggest ways
of coping and regaining control.
I have tried to be careful in that I do not suggest that every mental
aberration is the result of adverse spiritual activity. This was a danger
that became manifest during the last major ‘spirit release’
movement – at the time of the so-called ‘charismatic renewal’
of the nineteen seventies and eighties. Believing that the ‘charisms’
– the gifts of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost - were for everyone,
lay and ordained alike, many groups were formed, many were speaking in
tongues, and many were trying individual or group ‘exorcisms’.
There was much uncontrolled enthusiasm, and there were acknowledged instances
of minds being damaged by, particularly, the DIY exorcisms. (And even
now, for only recently I read of an eight year old autistic boy in Milwaukee
who died wrapped in sheets in a church service to ‘exorcise evil
spirits’.)
Undoubtedly there are responsible minds at work in the current and growing
awareness, and several and varied are the books now available that record
the work and practices. However, there are also those who are regarding
‘spirit release’ as another ‘Brownie badge’ to
sew on their sleeve, alongside Reiki, hypnotism and hypnotherapy, past
life regression and Neuro-linguistic Programming (NLP), channelling and
‘readings’, aromatherapy, shamanism, et al.
There is already a seriously debased currency in the training and practice
offered in some of these and other ‘complementary’ activities.
In Reiki, for the expenditure of two weekends and £550, one can
become a Reiki Master, capable of ‘training and empowering’
other aspirants – two weekends in which one can “…learn
many professional (sic) techniques and possibly heal or cure …psychic
attack, auric knots, lost spirits… - as well as Rainbow Reiki, NLP…”.
There are allegedly some who will offer ‘empowerment’ over
the phone!
The Web will reveal a number of sites that offer training in hypnotism
and hypnotherapy – ‘training’ that involves no actual
contact between the trainer and aspirant, only taped sessions, with a
final certificate that guarantees access to a lucrative source of income
in activities that include past life regression and NLP – “Jump
start your career for the Millennium” said one advert. I once underwent
hypnotism that was practised by someone whom I knew to be competent and
well trained. As I was about to be ‘submerged’ I felt my person
being entered by a spiritual entity, and was still sufficiently alert
to hold myself back from the deep state of hypnosis. I was aware that
had I carried on I could have been used and spoken through, as would be
a psychic medium. This to me is one of the greatest dangers of hypnotism
and regression – how can anyone possibly know what is going on or
‘who’ is speaking through the one being ‘regressed’?
Equally damaging is the stage hypnotist – opening minds in a very
charged atmosphere – for ‘entertainment’. The human
mind with its vulnerability to spiritual intrusion should not be treated
merely as a source of income for entertainers, no matter how great the
reputation that they have acquired. “The fastest way to learn stage
hypnotism and enhance your income” said yet another Web site.
It is possible to buy DIY books on how to ‘channel’ - how
to “give oneself ‘psychic protection’; work with guides
and angels; conduct channelled readings” – and no doubt contribute
to the flood of wisdom that is poured out in constant stream from ‘Ascended
Masters’ – with names that range from Aldebran to Zed. A weekend
workshop will produce a certificate in Aromatherapy, the practice of which
can involve the use of oils that have been demonstrated as having profound
effects upon the moods and mental states of susceptible individuals. ‘Shamanism’
leaves me completely baffled, for I just cannot bridge what I see as the
vast gulf between those who identify themselves as ‘shaymans’,
and the picture that I derive from the description in Encyclopaedia Britannica
of the origins, upbringing and subsequent life, and the ‘sorcery
and magic’, of the genuine Siberian Shaman.
The human mind and spirit are not there as playgrounds for the dilettante
or dabbler. Even the professionals in the workings of the mind can make
serious mistakes, as I found to my cost when my own mind was in dire danger
of suffering serious and permanent damage as the result of a medical mis-diagnosis,
inappropriate and totally unnecessary medication, and the machinations
of a consultant psychiatrist who could admit in correspondence to ‘lacunae
in my training’. Concerning the potential dangers to my ‘spirit’,
I was the author of my own peril through the innocent and gullible use
of a pendulum in dowsing. However, if I had not done so, I would not have
been able to write as I have done, nor to be constant and insistent, as
I shall be while I live, in declaring that spiritual intrusion is a reality,
and is the source and cause of many cases of mental disturbance and illness.
Conversely, I am equally insistent in my acknowledgement of the existence
of a powerful and universal source of benevolent spirituality.
As for the fairies – well, I am sure that you can make up your own
mind about them, although, having said that, I once knew a lady, alas
now dead, who had a pencil drawing that she had made from sight of a fairy
that she had seen among the flowers in her garden. It was an excellent
drawing....
|